An official website of the United States government

Here’s how you know

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

ASTP Logo
Skip Navigation
  • Topics
      • Featured
        • Featured

        • Certification of Health IT

          Ensures health IT meets standards for functionality, security, and interoperability.

        • Information Blocking

          Regulations ensuring health data is shared appropriately without improper barriers.

        • Interoperability

          Enables secure and seamless exchange of electronic health information among authorized users.

        • Health Information Technology Advisory Committee (HITAC)

          Advises on policies, standards, and implementation specifications for health data and technology.

        • United States Core Data for Interoperability (USCDI)

          Offers a standardized set of health data classes and constituent data elements for nationwide, interoperable health information exchange.

        • Trusted Exchange Framework & Common Agreement (TEFCA)

          Operates as a nationwide framework for the interoperability of electronic health information.

      • Artificial Intelligence
        • Artificial Intelligence

        • Artificial Intelligence (AI) at HHS

          HHS’ list of AI use cases is publicly available to search and reference. In addition to AI use case summaries, the inventory also includes information on data, IT infrastructure, internal governance, and much more.

      • Care Continuum
        • Care Continuum

          Explore the roles of health information and technology in broad healthcare settings, supporting seamless, coordinated patient care from prevention through recovery.

        • Care Settings

        • Behavioral Health

          Health information, policies, and technology supporting integrated care for mental health and substance use disorders.

        • Emergency Medical Services

          Rapid response and communication during health emergencies through health information and technology.

        • Long-Term & Post-Acute Care

          Health information and technology facilitating coordinated care beyond acute settings.

        • Maternal & Pediatric Care

          Technology addressing unique health needs of mothers and children.

        • Pharmacy & PDMP

          Electronic tools tracking controlled substance prescriptions to improve patient safety.

        • Public Health

          Using health information and technology to prevent disease, diagnose health conditions, and promote population health.

        • Clinical Topics

        • Clinical Quality & Safety

          Optimal care through measuring results, prioritizing improvements, and implementing and monitoring results.

        • Usability & Provider Burden

          Promotes health information and technology usability to reduce clinician burden and enhance patient care.

      • Interoperability
        • Interoperability

          Promotes standardized exchange and use of electronic health data to improve patient care, coordination, and public health outcomes.

        • Health IT Interoperability

          Enables secure and seamless exchange of electronic health information among authorized users.

        • Trusted Exchange Framework & Common Agreement (TEFCA)

          Facilitates secure, nationwide electronic health information sharing to connect providers, patients, public health agencies, and payers.

        • Certification of Health IT

          Provides certification criteria for developers of health IT modules that ensures health IT products meet the standards for functionality, security, and interoperability.

        • Standards & Technology

          Advance healthcare quality and safety through standardized health IT and secure health data exchange.

        • Information Blocking

          Prevents practices that interfere with the access, exchange, or use of electronic health information, as defined by the Cures Act.

        • Interoperability Standards Platform

          Serves as a homepage for tools and resources for understanding and using health IT standards and technologies.

        • Investments

          Support interoperability improvements nationwide.

        • Health IT & Health Information Exchange Basics

          Enable secure electronic sharing and access of patient health information, supporting healthcare providers and patients across care settings.

        • Patient Access to Health Records

          Ensure patients have secure and convenient access to their health records, supported by healthcare providers and health IT developers under HIPAA.

      • Policy
          • Policy

            Outlines federal regulations and strategic initiatives guiding effective use and secure exchange of electronic health information.

            • Legislation

              Delivers improvements in the delivery and experience of health care while enhancing health outcomes by leveraging health information technology.

            • Regulations

              Supports the adoption and promotion of standards-based health information.

            • TEFCA

              Operates as a nationwide framework for the interoperability of electronic health information.

            • HHS Health IT Alignment Program

              Coordinates health data and technology initiatives across HHS to enhance interoperability and effectiveness.

            • Health Information Technology Advisory Committee (HITAC)

              Advises on policies, standards, and implementation specifications for health data and technology.

            • Privacy & Security

              Protects electronic health information security through policy.

          • Rulemaking

          • HTI Rules

            Health data interoperability regulations ensuring secure, effective technology use.

          • Information Blocking

            Policies to prevent practices interfering with the access, exchange, and use of electronic health information.

          • Certification Program Rules

            Ensures health IT meets standards for functionality, security, and interoperability.

      • Research & Analysis
        • Research & Analysis

          Interactive datasets related to health IT data analysis, providing insights into adoption and use.

        • Dashboards

          Gives data-driven insight on how dashboards are driving health IT adoption and how they have helped users to meet federal healthcare incentives or programs.

        • Data Briefs

          Provides health IT adoption and use statistics derived from surveys and administrative data and in-depth analysis of health IT policies and programs.

        • Datasets

          Grants access to raw datasets from ASTP related to health IT adoption, health IT capabilities and other topics.

        • Quick Stats

          Streamlines data into visualizations of key data and summarizes the latest statistics, facts and figures about health IT.

        • About Health IT Research & Analysis

          Provides information about how health IT data are collected, analyzed, and published.

  • Resources & Tools
      • Featured
        • Featured Resources & Tools

          Highlights key tools and guidance supporting effective health IT implementation, interoperability, patient engagement, and compliance with federal standards.

        • Interoperability Standards

          ASTP’s initiatives in health data standards enable secure electronic health data exchange.

        • TEFCA Resources

          Data sheets, videos, and documents to guide users of the TEFCA framework and exchange.

        • Implementation Resources

          Technical resources and tools supporting healthcare providers, clinicians, and developers of health IT products.

        • Health IT Playbook

          Strategies, recommendations, and best practices for implementing and using health data and technology.

        • Security Risk Assessment Tool

          Desktop application supporting providers conducting HIPAA security risk assessments.

        • Patient Engagement Playbook

          Practical reference tool for clinicians, staff, and other innovators around the world to improve patient engagement.

        • Certified Health IT Product List (CHPL)

          A comprehensive and authoritative listing of successfully tested and certified health IT modules.

        • Conformance Test Tools & Edge Testing Tool

          Resources for developers implementing standards to enable health information interoperability.

        • Health IT Feedback Form

          Users can submit feedback regarding health data and technology usability, interoperability, and compliance issues.

      • Resources
        • Resources

          Collection of practical materials, videos, educational tools, and user guides designed to support successful implementation and adoption of health IT systems.

        • Get It, Check It, Use It Guide

          A guide for patients and caregivers who want to access, review, and use their health records.

        • Video Resources

          A repository of informational videos created by ASTP.

        • Health IT Curriculum Resources for Educators

          Instructional materials to help healthcare workers stay current in the changing healthcare environment and deliver care more effectively.

        • Fact Sheets

          A repository of fact sheets created by ASTP.

      • Tools & Technology
          • Implementation

          • Certified Health IT Product List

            A comprehensive and authoritative listing of successfully tested and certified health IT modules.

          • Electronic Clinical Quality Improvement Resource Center

            Provides common standards and shared technologies to monitor and analyze the quality of health care and patient outcomes.

          • Security Risk Assessment Tool

            Desktop application supporting providers conducting HIPAA security risk assessments.

          • Tools

          • Edge Testing Tool

            A centralized collection of testing tools and resources supporting health IT developers and users fully evaluating specific technical standards.

          • Conformance Test Tools

            ONC-approved conformance resources supporting developers implementing standards to enable health information interoperability.

          • Get It, Check It, Use It Guide

            A guide for patients and caregivers who want to access, review, and use their health records.

          • Quick Links

          • Certification & Testing
          • USCDI
          • USCDI+
          • Interoperability Standards Platform (ISP)
          • FHIR
          • ASTP Standards Bulletins
          • Patient ID & Matching Adopted Standards for HHS
  • News & Events
      • Media Center
      • ASTP Blog
      • News
      • Events
      • Featured Blogs & News

      • HTI-5 Proposed Rule

        HTI-5 Proposed Rule

        HTI-5 Proposed Rule The Assistant Secretary for Technology Policy/Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ASTP/ONC) published the…

        TEFCA’s growing, are you in? Take a look at who’s participating in TEFCA Exchange

        TEFCA’s growing, are you in? Take a look at who’s participating in TEFCA Exchange

        We are pleased to announce that the beta version of an interactive, searchable map for TEFCA™ participation is now available. The map released today is another example of our commitment to transparency.

        USCDI v6 and Standards Bulletin 25-2

        USCDI v6 and Standards Bulletin 25-2

        The United States Core Data for Interoperability Version 6 (USCDI v6) is now available! USCDI v6 includes an updated list of data classes and elements that seek to advance health data in a way that will benefit users of health IT. We also released the latest Standards Bulletin, which describes ASTP’s continued expansion of USCDI.

  • About
      • Overview
        • About ASTP

          Mission, role, and responsibilities of ASTP.

        • Leadership

          Profiles of ASTP’s senior leadership team.

        • History

          Timeline of ASTP’s evolution and key milestones.

        • Budget & Performance

          Financial reports and performance accountability.

        • Investments

          Strategic investments in programs, policies, and technology.

        • Reports to Congress

          Annual health data and technology progress updates to Congress.

      • Careers
        • Careers at ASTP

          View opportunities with ASTP.

        • Working at ASTP

          Overview of workplace culture and employee experience.

      • Contact
        • Contact Us

          Reach ASTP with general inquiries.

        • Health IT Feedback Form

          Users can submit feedback regarding health data and technology usability, interoperability, and compliance issues.

        • Report Issue with Certified Health IT

          Complaint process to resolve any issues of potential noncompliance with certification requirements.

        • Information Blocking Claim

          Form to report alleged information blocking practices.

        • Speaker Request

          Form to request ASTP experts for speaking engagements.

      • Funding Opportunities
        • Funding Announcements

          ASTP’s contractors and grantees play a valuable role in helping promote better health care for Americans by fostering interoperable health data and technology.

        • Grants Management & Process

          Learn about opportunities for funding through grants and cooperative agreements.

Popular searches: certifications information blocking interoperability

Health IT Research & Analysis

    • Data Types
    • Categories
    • Sort By
Data Briefs iconData Briefs

Access and Use of Electronic Health Information by Individuals with Cancer: 2017-2018

No. 50 | January 2020
  • Access and Use of Electronic Health Information by Individuals with Cancer: 2017-2018 [PDF – 463.7 KB]
Link to Page Icon Link to Page
  • Overview

Nearly 40 percent of individuals will be diagnosed with cancer at some point in their lifetime. For these individuals, access, exchange, and use of electronic health information is critical to managing their complex health needs. Patient access to online medical records enable these individuals to track their health information, communicate with their care team, and request refills of medications. In 2016, the President’s Cancer Panel sought to improve cancer-related outcomes with connected health by calling attention to enabling individuals to manage their health information and participate in their care across the cancer continuum. This data brief uses the National Cancer Institute’s nationally representative Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) to examine the access and use of health information technology by individuals diagnosed with cancer. To achieve a robust sample, we have combined data from the 2017 and 2018 surveys.

Highlights

  • In 2017 and 2018, individuals with a previous cancer diagnosis were offered online access to their medical record by a health care provider or insurer at higher rates than those with no previous cancer diagnosis (60% vs. 50%).
  • Among individuals offered access to an online medical record, nearly seven in 10 individuals with a recent cancer diagnosis viewed their record at least once in the past year – this is higher than those who never had cancer.
  • Individuals with a recent cancer diagnosis were more likely to cite that they prefer to speak to a provider directly (88%) compared to individuals with no cancer diagnosis (73%).
  • A higher percentage of individuals with a recent cancer diagnosis experienced gaps in information exchange compared to individuals with no previous cancer diagnosis.

Individuals with a previous cancer diagnosis reported being offered access to their online medical record at higher rates than those who have never had cancer.

Figure 1: Percent of individuals who were offered access to their online medical record by a health care provider or insurer by individual’s cancer status, 2017-2018 combined sample.

This figure contains a stacked vertical bar chart showing the percent of individuals who were offered access to their online medical record by a health care provider or insurer and whether they viewed their record by cancer status. Among individuals never diagnosed with cancer, 50 percent reported they were offered access to their online medical record (28 percent of these individuals viewed their record; 22 percent did not view their record). Among individuals with a recent cancer diagnosis, 58 percent reported they were offered access to their online medical record, a statistically significant increase from those who never had cancer (p<0.1) (40 percent of these individuals viewed their record, a statistically significant increase from those who never had cancer (p<0.05); 18 percent did not view their record). Among cancer survivors, 59 percent of individuals were offered access to their online medical record, a statistically significant increase from those who never had cancer (p<0.05) (29 percent of these individuals viewed their record; 29 percent did not view their record).
Source: HINTS 5, Cycle 1, 2017; HINTS 5, Cycle 2, 2018
Notes: Denominator represents all individuals. Percentage reflects weighted national estimate. Statistically significant from the “Never Had Cancer” group (*p<0.05; ^p<0.1). Recent cancer diagnosis was defined as individuals who reported that their first cancer diagnosis occurred less than five years ago. Cancer survivor was defined as individuals who reported that their first cancer diagnosis occurred more than five years ago. Never had cancer was defined as individuals who reported that they have never been diagnosed with cancer.
  • About six in 10 individuals with a previous cancer diagnosis reported they had been offered online access to their medical record by a health care provider or insurer.

Among individuals offered access to an online medical record, nearly seven in 10 individuals with a recent cancer diagnosis viewed their record at least once in the past year.

Figure 2: Frequency of viewing an online medical record within the past year among those who had been offered an online medical record by a health care provider or insurer by cancer status, 2017-2018 combined sample.

This figure contains a stacked vertical bar chart showing the frequency of viewing an online medical record within the past year among individuals who had been offered access by cancer status. Among individuals never diagnosed with cancer, 56 percent of individuals who were offered access to their online medical record viewed it at least once in the past year (29 percent viewed their record 1 to 2 times; 17 percent viewed their record 3 to 5 times, and 10 percent viewed their record 6 or more times). Among individuals with a recent cancer diagnosis, 68 percent of individuals who were offered access to their online medical record viewed it at least once in the past year, a statistically significant increase from those who never had cancer (p<0.05), (25 percent viewed their record 1 to 2 times; 22 percent viewed their record 3 to 5 times, and 21 percent viewed their record 6 or more times, a statistically significant increase from those who never had cancer (p<0.05)). Among cancer survivors, 51 percent of individuals who were offered access to their online medical record viewed it at least once in the past year (20 percent viewed their record 1 to 2 times; 20 percent viewed their record 3 to 5 times, and 11 percent viewed their record 6 or more times). There were no statistically significant differences in the frequency of viewing an online medical record between individuals who never had cancer and cancer survivors.
Source: HINTS 5, Cycle 1, 2017; HINTS 5, Cycle 2, 2018.
Note: Denominator represents individuals who were offered access to their online medical record. Statistically significant from the “Never Had Cancer” group (*p<0.05).
  • Among individuals offered access to an online medical record, those with a recent cancer diagnosis reported viewing their record at higher rates compared with individuals who never had cancer.
  • Among individuals offered access to an online medical record, those with a recent cancer diagnosis were two times more likely to view their record six or more times in the past year compared to who never had cancer.
  • Cancer survivors viewed their online medical record in the past year at similar rates to those who never had cancer.

Individuals with a previous cancer diagnosis most commonly cited a preference to speak to a health care provider directly as the reason why they did not view their online medical record.

Table 1: Reasons for not accessing online medical record as reported by individuals who did not view their online medical record within the past year by cancer status, 2017-2018 combined sample.

 Previous Cancer Diagnosis
Reason for Not Using Online RecordNever Had CancerRecent Cancer DiagnosisCancer Survivor
Prefer to speak to health care provider directly73% 88%^ 80% 
Did not have a need to use your online medical record 62% 55% 60% 
Concerned about the privacy/security of online medical record 20% 24% 19% 
No longer have an online medical record 16% 12% 15% 
Do not have a way to access the website 15% 11% 12% 
Source: HINTS 5, Cycle 1, 2017; HINTS 5, Cycle 2, 2018.
Note: Denominator represents individuals who were offered access but did not view their online medical record within the past year. Statistically significant from the “Never Had Cancer” group (^p<0.1).
  • Among those who did not view their online medical record within the past year, more than half of individuals with a previous cancer diagnosis cited that they did not have a need to use their online medical record.
  • Individuals with a recent cancer diagnosis were more likely to cite that they prefer to speak to a provider directly (88%) compared to individuals with no cancer diagnosis (73%).
  • Among those who did not view their online medical record within the past year, there were no differences by cancer status for not viewing their record due to lack of need to use their online medical record, concerns about privacy and security, or no longer having a record.

The types of information in individuals’ online medical record did not vary by having a previous cancer diagnosis.

Figure 3: Types of information reported in individuals’ online medical record amongst those who were offered and accessed their record at least once by cancer status, 2017-2018 combined sample.

This figure contains a horizontal bar chart which represents the types of information reported in individuals’ medical record amongst those who were offered and accessed their record by cancer status. Among individuals never diagnosed with cancer, office visit summaries were reported in 77% of, a list of health/medical problems was reported in 71% of records, an allergy list was reported in 62% of records, an immunization or vaccination history was reported in 57% of records, and clinical notes were reported in 51% of records. Among individuals with a recent cancer diagnosis, office visit summaries were reported in 74% of, a list of health/medical problems was reported in 68% of records, an allergy list was reported in 59% of records, an immunization or vaccination history was reported in 56% of records, and clinical notes were reported in 47% of records. Among cancer survivors, office visit summaries were reported in 76% of records, a list of health/medical problems was reported in 72% of records, an allergy list was reported in 60% of records, an immunization or vaccination history was reported in 56% of records, and clinical notes were reported in 57% of records. There were no statistically significant differences in the types of information reported in individuals’ medical records by cancer status.
Source: HINTS 5, Cycle 1, 2017; HINTS 5, Cycle 2, 2018.
Note: Denominator represents individuals who were offered and viewed their online medical record within the past year
  • A majority of individuals reported that their online medical record included summaries of their office visits and a list of their health/medical problems.
  • Among individuals who viewed their online medical record in the past year, about six in 10 individuals with a previous cancer diagnosis reported that their record included their vaccination history and allergy list.
  • Among individuals who viewed their online medical record in the past year, about half of individuals with a previous cancer diagnosis reported that their online medical record included clinical notes.

Individuals’ use of online medical record did not vary by cancer status.

Table 2: Reported online medical record functionalities used by individuals who were offered and accessed their record at least once by cancer status, 2017-2018 combine sample.

 Previous Cancer Diagnosis
Use of Online Medical RecordNever Had CancerRecent Cancer DiagnosisCancer Survivor
Convenience Functions
Request refill of medications38%41%45%
Fill out forms or paperwork related to your health care41%49%32%
Updating Medical Record
Request correction of inaccurate information7%7%4%
Add health information22%22%22%
Communicating with Health Care Provider
Securely message health care provider and staff (e.g., e-mail)51%47%41%
Download or Transmit
Download online medical record21%22%23%
Transmit data to outside party (e.g., healthcare provider, caregiver, service, or app)15%23%15%
Self-Management and Decision Making
Help you make a decision about how to treat an illness or condition22%27%18%
Source: HINTS 5, Cycle 1, 2017; HINTS 5, Cycle 2, 2018.
Note: Denominator represents individuals who were offered access to the online medical record and viewed their online medical records at least once within the last year. Statistically significant from the “Never Had Cancer” group (^p<0.1).
  • About a quarter of individuals with a recent cancer diagnosis viewed their record and transmitted data to an outside party (another healthcare provider, caregiver, or app/service).
  • Among individuals who viewed their online medical record in the past year, more than four in 10 individuals with a previous cancer diagnosis used their online medical record to request medication refills.
  • Few individuals with a previous cancer diagnosis requested corrections of inaccurate information in their online medical record.
  • About half of individuals with a recent cancer diagnosis viewed their record and used secure messaging to communicate with a health care provider.
  • Cancer survivors were less likely use their online medical record to fill out paperwork than those who never had cancer.

Individuals with a previous cancer diagnosis were more likely to be older, insured, have visited a doctor in the past year, and have a chronic condition.

Table 3: Socio-demographic and health-related characteristics of individuals by cancer status, 2017-2018 combined sample.

 Previous Cancer Diagnosis
CharacteristicNever Had Cancer (reference)Recent Cancer DiagnosisCancer Survivor
GenderMale49%47%40%*
Female51%53%60%*
Age18-3425%4%*3%*
35-4622%8%*8%*
47-6437%42%36%
65+17%46%*53%*
Race/EthnicityHispanic16%9%*8%*
Non-Hispanic Asian6%< 1%*2%*
Non-Hispanic Black12%7%*8%*
Non-Hispanic White63%80%*80%*
Non-Hispanic Other3%3%2%
Annual Household Income$0 to $34,99929%30%29%
$35,000 to $74,99933%33%35%
$75,000 or more38%37%36%
EducationCollege Degree or more33%31%29%
Less than College67%69%71%
Internet access and useYes83%80%78%*
No17%20%22%*
GeographyUrban86%82%85%
Rural14%18%15%
Doctor Visit in Past YearYes81%97%*93%*
No19%3%*7%*
Health Insurance CoverageYes91%99%*97%*
No9%1%*3%*
Have a Chronic ConditionYes60%75%*77%*
No40%25%*23%*
Source: HINTS 5, Cycle 1, 2017; HINTS 5, Cycle 2, 2018.
Note: Denominator represents all individuals. Percentage reflects weighted national estimate. Statistically significant from the “Never Had Cancer” group (*p<0.05). Chronic condition was defined as having at least one of the following conditions: diabetes, hypertension, chronic heart disease, chronic lung disease, arthritis, or a mental health condition.
  • Nearly all individuals with a previous cancer diagnosis were insured and visited a doctor in the past year
  • There were no differences in household income, education, and geography (rural vs. urban) by cancer status.
  • About three-quarters of individuals with a previous cancer diagnosis also had a chronic health condition.

About three-quarters of individuals with a previous cancer diagnosis reported owning a tablet or smartphone.

Table 4: Percent of individuals who reported having a smartphone, tablet, electronic monitoring device, or health and wellness app, 2017-2018 combined sample.

 Previous Cancer Diagnosis
Type of DeviceNever Had CancerRecent Cancer DiagnosisCancer Survivor
Electronic Monitoring Device
(e.g. Fitbit, blood glucose meter, blood pressure device)
35%33%39%
Tablet60%61%56%
Smartphone81%71%*66%*
Tablet or Smartphone85%77%*74%*
Health & Wellness App
(among those with a tablet or smartphone)
47%44%41%^
Source: HINTS 5, Cycle 1, 2017; HINTS 5, Cycle 2, 2018.
Note: Denominator represents all individuals. Percentage reflects weighted national estimate. Statistically significant from the “Never Had Cancer” group (*p<0.05; ^p<0.1).
  • Individuals with a previous cancer diagnosis reported owning smartphones at lower rates compared to individuals who have never had cancer.
  • Tablet ownership did not vary by having a previous diagnosis of cancer in 2017 and 2018.
  • Cancer survivors reported lower rates of having a health & wellness app on their tablet or smartphone compared to individuals with no previous cancer diagnosis.
  • About a third of individuals nationwide reported owning an electronic monitoring device.

Nearly four in 10 cancer survivors who used a health & wellness app or other electronic monitoring devices reported sharing information from their device with a health professional.

Table 5: Percent of individuals who reported using their health and wellness app or other electronic monitoring device to help discuss, track, and/or make decisions regarding their health by cancer status, 2017-2018 combined sample.

 Previous Cancer Diagnosis
Use of Electronic DeviceNever Had CancerRecent Cancer DiagnosisCancer Survivor
Individuals with a health & wellness app1
Track progress on a health-related goal e.g. quit smoking, lose weight, increase physical activity)73%62%^67%
Make a decision about how to treat an illness or condition47%44%48%
Discuss your health with your health care provider44%53%47%
Individuals with a health & wellness app or other electronic monitoring device2
Shared information from a smartphone, tablet, or other electronic monitoring device with a health professional27%25%37%*
Source: HINTS 5, Cycle 1, 2017; HINTS 5, Cycle 2, 2018.
Note: Examples of an electronic monitoring device include Fitbit, blood glucose meter, and/or blood pressure monitor. 1Denominator represents the sample of individuals that report having a health and wellness app; 2Denominator represents the sample of individuals that report having a health and wellness app or electronic monitoring device.
  • About two-thirds of individuals with a previous cancer diagnosis used a health & wellness app to track progress on a health related goal (e.g. quit smoking, lose weight, or increase physical activity).
  • About half of individuals with a previous cancer diagnosis used their health & wellness app to discuss their health with a health care provider and to make treatment decisions.
  • Fewer individuals with a recent cancer diagnosis used their health & wellness apps to track progress on a health-related goal compared to individuals who have never had cancer.

Individuals with a recent cancer diagnosis were more likely to experience a gap in information exchange compared to individuals who have never had cancer.

Figure 4: Percent of individuals who reported a gap in information exchange by cancer status, 2017-2018 combined sample.

This figure contains a horizontal bar char which represents the percent of individuals who experienced a gap in information exchange by cancer status. Among individuals never diagnosed with cancer, 6% reported they had to redo a test or procedure because the earlier results were not available, 6% reported they had to provide their medical history again because their chart could not be found, 14% reported they had to wait for results longer than they thought reasonable, 19% reported they had to bring a test result to an appointment, and 32% reported they had to do at least one of the above. Among individuals with a recent cancer diagnosis, 7% reported they had to redo a test or procedure because the earlier results were not available, 6% reported they had to provide their medical history again because their chart could not be found, 18% reported they had to wait for results longer than they thought reasonable, 28% reported they had to bring a test result to an appointment, a statistically significant different from those who never had cancer (p
Source: HINTS 5, Cycle 1, 2017; HINTS 5, Cycle 2, 2018
Note: Denominator represents individuals who went to a health care provider at least once within the past year (Never had cancer = 81%; Recent Cancer Diagnosis = 97%; Cancer Survivor = 93%). Statistically significant from the “Never Had Cancer” group (*p<0.05; ^p<0.1).
  • Four in 10 individuals with a recent cancer diagnosis experienced a gap in information exchange.
  • More than a quarter of individuals with a recent cancer diagnosis reported having to bring a test result to appointment.
  • Few individuals reported having to redo a test/procedure or provide their medical history again because their health information was not available

Summary

There are almost 17 million cancer survivors in the United States. Today, individuals with a previous cancer diagnosis represent a growing segment of the population (3). Access to online medical records can enable cancer patients and survivors to manage complex and ongoing health information needs (4). Approximately 60 percent of individuals with a previous cancer diagnosis reported being offered access to their online medical record by a healthcare provider or insurer. Among individuals who were offered access, five in 10 cancer survivors and seven in 10 individuals with a recent diagnosis reported viewing their online medical record at least once within the past year (5).

Individuals with a previous cancer diagnosis were offered access to their online medical records at higher rates compared to those who never had cancer. This is consistent with previous research that shows individuals who have chronic conditions, visit their doctor regularly, and are insured report higher rates of being offered access to an online medical record (5). Individuals recently diagnosed with cancer viewed their record at higher rates compared to those never diagnosed with cancer. However, there were no differences in rates of viewing an online medical record between cancer survivors and those never diagnosed.

This analysis highlights missed opportunities for many individuals with cancer to benefit from access and use of online medical records. Approximately forty percent of individuals with a previous cancer history reported not being offered access to their online medical record. Additionally, a substantial portion of individuals with a previous cancer diagnosis did not view their online medical records when access was offered. Common reasons for not viewing one’s online medical record included preferring to speak directly with a healthcare provider, reporting not having a need to use an online medical record, and concerns about privacy and security of online medical records.

Furthermore, although rates of viewing online medical records were higher among those with a recent cancer diagnosis, online medical records appear to be underutilized by these individuals. This group did not report greater use of most functions of online medical records (such as help in making a medical decision about an illness) compared to individuals without cancer. Online medical records can serve as important tools for managing complex health information needs and ensuring that individuals with cancer are not lost in their transition from patient to survivor (6). Individuals with cancer are more likely to see multiple healthcare providers. As a result, those recently diagnosed are more likely to experience gaps as information is exchanged, which may result in additional burden to the patient (e.g., having to bring a test result such as an X-ray or MRI to an appointment). This population may benefit from more information about the functions of online medical records for healthcare management, such as the ability to exchange secure messages with a provider, correct inaccurate information, or add new information to a medical record. These results also indicate that individuals with a previous cancer diagnosis may also have technology needs and preferences that differ from the general population. For example, individuals with a prior cancer diagnosis are less likely to use smartphones.

To encourage engagement, healthcare practitioners should consider the unique characteristics, information needs, and technology preferences of this population when developing patient-facing medical records and related digital tools to support the health of all individuals affected by cancer (4). Previous work has shown that individuals are more likely to use their online medical record when encouraged by a healthcare provider (7). Educating providers on the benefits of using online medical records for cancer patients could increase utilization of these tools. The Patient Engagement Playbook and the Guide to Getting and Using your Health Record deliver tips to providers and patients for making this process easier.

Definitions

Definitions for variables derived by ONC during this analysis are described below:

Offered access to an online medical record: Individuals were considered to be offered access to an online medical record if they responded “yes” to either health care provider or insurer for the question, “Have you ever been offered online access to your medical records by: a) health care provider? b) health insurer?”

Recent cancer diagnosis: Individuals who reported that their first cancer diagnosis occurred less than five years ago.

Cancer survivor: Individuals who reported that their first cancer diagnosis occurred more than five years ago.

Never had cancer: Individuals who reported that they have never been diagnosed with cancer.

Data Source and Methods

Data are from the National Cancer Institute’s (NCI) Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS). Since 2003, NCI has sponsored HINTS to assess the impacts of health communication, specifically measuring: how people access and use health information, how people use information technology to manage their health and health information, and the degree to which people are engaged in health behaviors.

ONC staff, working with the National Partnership of Women and Families and NCI, developed the survey content related to health IT use for HINTS 5. HINTS 5, Cycle 1 (2017) data were collected from January through May, 2017. HINTS 5, Cycle 2 (2018) data were collected from January through May 2018. The sample design for HINTS 5, Cycle 1 (2017) and Cycle 2 (2018) consisted of a single-mode mail survey, using the Next Birthday Method for respondent selection.

The sample design for the HINTS 5, Cycle 1 (2017) and Cycle 2 (2018) surveys consisted of two-stages. In the first stage, a stratified sample of addresses was selected from a file of residential addresses. In the second-stage, one adult was selected within each sampled household. The sampling frame consisted of a database of addresses used by Marketing Systems Group (MSG) to provide random samples addresses. Complete data were collected from 3,527 respondents. The response rate was in 33%, and results were weighted to account for non-response and generate national estimates.

The analyses conducted in this data brief primarily focused on questions from sections B and D. The questions asked in the HINTS 5, Cycle 1 (2017) and Cycle 2 (2018) survey can be found at https://hints.cancer.gov/docs/Instruments/HINTS5_Cycle1_Annotated_Instrument_English.pdf.

References

1. National Cancer Institute. Cancer Statistics. (April 2018). Available here: https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/understanding/statistics

2. President’s Cancer Panel. (November 2016). Improving Cancer-Related Outcomes with Connected Health: A Report to the President of the United States from the President’s Cancer Panel. Bethesda, Maryland.

3. Bluethmann et al. (July 2016). Anticipating the ”Silver Tsunami”: Prevalence Trajectories and Comorbidity Burden among Older Cancer Survivors in the United States. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 25:1029-1036.

4. Kent et al. (November 2012). Health information needs and health-related quality of life in a diverse population of long-term cancer survivors. Patient Ed Couns. 89:345-352.

5. Patel V & Johnson C. (May 2019). Trends in Individuals’ Access and Use of Online Medical Records and Technology for Health Needs: 2017-2018. ONC Data Brief, no.48 Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology: Washington DC.

6. Hewitt M, Greenfield S & Stovall E. (November 2005). From cancer patient to cancer survivor: lost in transition. Washington: National Academies Press.

7. Patel V & Johnson C. (April 2018). Individuals’ use of online medical records and technology for health needs. ONC Data Brief, no.40. Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology: Washington DC.

Acknowledgements

Authors CJ and VP are with the Office of Technology, within the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology. The data brief was drafted under the direction of Mera Choi, Director of Technical Strategy and Analysis, and Talisha Searcy, Director of the Data Analysis Branch. Author MK is with the National Cancer Institute and contributed to this brief under the approval of the NCI’s Health Communication and Informatics Research Branch in coordination with the ONC.

Suggested Citation

Johnson C, Krakow M, Patel V. (January 2019). Trends in Individuals’ Access and Use of Online Medical Records and Technology for Health Needs: 2017-2018. ONC Data Brief, no.50. Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology: Washington DC.

Form Approved OMB# 0990-0379 Exp. Date 9/30/2025
Submit Beta Feedback

Submit Beta Feedback

Subscribe for Email Updates

EXPLORE

  • Certification of Health IT
  • Information Blocking
  • Interoperability
  • Health Information Technology Advisory Committee (HITAC)
  • Patient Access to Health Records
  • TEFCA
  • Policy
  • Resources

DATA

  • HealthData.gov
  • Health IT Research & Analysis

NEWS & EVENTS

  • Media Center
  • ASTP Blog
  • News
  • Events

ABOUT

  • About ASTP/ONC
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Funding Opportunities
ASTP Logo HHS
Linkedin
X
YouTube
  • Privacy Policy
  • Website Disclaimers
  • Viewers & Players
  • GobiernoUSA.gov
  • HHS Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
  • Archived Content

External Link Notice

Welcome to our new beta site!

Thank you for visiting the new beta version of the HealthIT.gov website! We’re continuing to make improvements behind the scenes. You may see some features and performance change during this time. We welcome your feedback using the "Submit Feedback" button at the bottom of the page to help us improve your experience!