An official website of the United States government

Here’s how you know

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

ASTP Logo
Skip Navigation
  • Topics
      • Featured
        • Featured

        • Certification of Health IT

          Ensures health IT meets standards for functionality, security, and interoperability.

        • Information Blocking

          Regulations ensuring health data is shared appropriately without improper barriers.

        • Interoperability

          Enables secure and seamless exchange of electronic health information among authorized users.

        • Health Information Technology Advisory Committee (HITAC)

          Advises on policies, standards, and implementation specifications for health data and technology.

        • United States Core Data for Interoperability (USCDI)

          Offers a standardized set of health data classes and constituent data elements for nationwide, interoperable health information exchange.

        • Trusted Exchange Framework & Common Agreement (TEFCA)

          Operates as a nationwide framework for the interoperability of electronic health information.

      • Artificial Intelligence
        • Artificial Intelligence

        • Artificial Intelligence (AI) at HHS

          HHS’ list of AI use cases is publicly available to search and reference. In addition to AI use case summaries, the inventory also includes information on data, IT infrastructure, internal governance, and much more.

      • Care Continuum
        • Care Continuum

          Explore the roles of health information and technology in broad healthcare settings, supporting seamless, coordinated patient care from prevention through recovery.

        • Care Settings

        • Behavioral Health

          Health information, policies, and technology supporting integrated care for mental health and substance use disorders.

        • Emergency Medical Services

          Rapid response and communication during health emergencies through health information and technology.

        • Long-Term & Post-Acute Care

          Health information and technology facilitating coordinated care beyond acute settings.

        • Maternal & Pediatric Care

          Technology addressing unique health needs of mothers and children.

        • Pharmacy & PDMP

          Electronic tools tracking controlled substance prescriptions to improve patient safety.

        • Public Health

          Using health information and technology to prevent disease, diagnose health conditions, and promote population health.

        • Clinical Topics

        • Clinical Quality & Safety

          Optimal care through measuring results, prioritizing improvements, and implementing and monitoring results.

        • Usability & Provider Burden

          Promotes health information and technology usability to reduce clinician burden and enhance patient care.

      • Interoperability
        • Interoperability

          Promotes standardized exchange and use of electronic health data to improve patient care, coordination, and public health outcomes.

        • Health IT Interoperability

          Enables secure and seamless exchange of electronic health information among authorized users.

        • Trusted Exchange Framework & Common Agreement (TEFCA)

          Facilitates secure, nationwide electronic health information sharing to connect providers, patients, public health agencies, and payers.

        • Certification of Health IT

          Provides certification criteria for developers of health IT modules that ensures health IT products meet the standards for functionality, security, and interoperability.

        • Standards & Technology

          Advance healthcare quality and safety through standardized health IT and secure health data exchange.

        • Information Blocking

          Prevents practices that interfere with the access, exchange, or use of electronic health information, as defined by the Cures Act.

        • Interoperability Standards Platform

          Serves as a homepage for tools and resources for understanding and using health IT standards and technologies.

        • Investments

          Support interoperability improvements nationwide.

        • Health IT & Health Information Exchange Basics

          Enable secure electronic sharing and access of patient health information, supporting healthcare providers and patients across care settings.

        • Patient Access to Health Records

          Ensure patients have secure and convenient access to their health records, supported by healthcare providers and health IT developers under HIPAA.

      • Policy
          • Policy

            Outlines federal regulations and strategic initiatives guiding effective use and secure exchange of electronic health information.

            • Legislation

              Delivers improvements in the delivery and experience of health care while enhancing health outcomes by leveraging health information technology.

            • Regulations

              Supports the adoption and promotion of standards-based health information.

            • TEFCA

              Operates as a nationwide framework for the interoperability of electronic health information.

            • HHS Health IT Alignment Program

              Coordinates health data and technology initiatives across HHS to enhance interoperability and effectiveness.

            • Health Information Technology Advisory Committee (HITAC)

              Advises on policies, standards, and implementation specifications for health data and technology.

            • Privacy & Security

              Protects electronic health information security through policy.

          • Rulemaking

          • HTI Rules

            Health data interoperability regulations ensuring secure, effective technology use.

          • Information Blocking

            Policies to prevent practices interfering with the access, exchange, and use of electronic health information.

          • Certification Program Rules

            Ensures health IT meets standards for functionality, security, and interoperability.

      • Research & Analysis
        • Research & Analysis

          Interactive datasets related to health IT data analysis, providing insights into adoption and use.

        • Dashboards

          Gives data-driven insight on how dashboards are driving health IT adoption and how they have helped users to meet federal healthcare incentives or programs.

        • Data Briefs

          Provides health IT adoption and use statistics derived from surveys and administrative data and in-depth analysis of health IT policies and programs.

        • Datasets

          Grants access to raw datasets from ASTP related to health IT adoption, health IT capabilities and other topics.

        • Quick Stats

          Streamlines data into visualizations of key data and summarizes the latest statistics, facts and figures about health IT.

        • About Health IT Research & Analysis

          Provides information about how health IT data are collected, analyzed, and published.

  • Resources & Tools
      • Featured
        • Featured Resources & Tools

          Highlights key tools and guidance supporting effective health IT implementation, interoperability, patient engagement, and compliance with federal standards.

        • Interoperability Standards

          ASTP’s initiatives in health data standards enable secure electronic health data exchange.

        • TEFCA Resources

          Data sheets, videos, and documents to guide users of the TEFCA framework and exchange.

        • Implementation Resources

          Technical resources and tools supporting healthcare providers, clinicians, and developers of health IT products.

        • Health IT Playbook

          Strategies, recommendations, and best practices for implementing and using health data and technology.

        • Security Risk Assessment Tool

          Desktop application supporting providers conducting HIPAA security risk assessments.

        • Patient Engagement Playbook

          Practical reference tool for clinicians, staff, and other innovators around the world to improve patient engagement.

        • Certified Health IT Product List (CHPL)

          A comprehensive and authoritative listing of successfully tested and certified health IT modules.

        • Conformance Test Tools & Edge Testing Tool

          Resources for developers implementing standards to enable health information interoperability.

        • Health IT Feedback Form

          Users can submit feedback regarding health data and technology usability, interoperability, and compliance issues.

      • Resources
        • Resources

          Collection of practical materials, videos, educational tools, and user guides designed to support successful implementation and adoption of health IT systems.

        • Get It, Check It, Use It Guide

          A guide for patients and caregivers who want to access, review, and use their health records.

        • Video Resources

          A repository of informational videos created by ASTP.

        • Health IT Curriculum Resources for Educators

          Instructional materials to help healthcare workers stay current in the changing healthcare environment and deliver care more effectively.

        • Fact Sheets

          A repository of fact sheets created by ASTP.

      • Tools & Technology
          • Implementation

          • Certified Health IT Product List

            A comprehensive and authoritative listing of successfully tested and certified health IT modules.

          • Electronic Clinical Quality Improvement Resource Center

            Provides common standards and shared technologies to monitor and analyze the quality of health care and patient outcomes.

          • Security Risk Assessment Tool

            Desktop application supporting providers conducting HIPAA security risk assessments.

          • Tools

          • Edge Testing Tool

            A centralized collection of testing tools and resources supporting health IT developers and users fully evaluating specific technical standards.

          • Conformance Test Tools

            ONC-approved conformance resources supporting developers implementing standards to enable health information interoperability.

          • Get It, Check It, Use It Guide

            A guide for patients and caregivers who want to access, review, and use their health records.

          • Quick Links

          • Certification & Testing
          • USCDI
          • USCDI+
          • Interoperability Standards Platform (ISP)
          • FHIR
          • ASTP Standards Bulletins
          • Patient ID & Matching Adopted Standards for HHS
  • News & Events
      • Media Center
      • ASTP Blog
      • News
      • Events
      • Featured Blogs & News

      • TEFCA’s growing, are you in? Take a look at who’s participating in TEFCA Exchange

        TEFCA’s growing, are you in? Take a look at who’s participating in TEFCA Exchange

        We are pleased to announce that the beta version of an interactive, searchable map for TEFCA™ participation is now available. The map released today is another example of our commitment to transparency.

        ASTP/ONC Rule Creates Prescription Drug Cost Transparency, Eases Administrative Burden, and Speeds Access to Care

        ASTP/ONC Rule Creates Prescription Drug Cost Transparency, Eases Administrative Burden, and Speeds Access to Care

        ASTP/ONC released a final rule enabling the use of certified EHRs to submit prior authorizations, select drugs consistent with a patient’s insurance coverage, and exchange electronic prescription information with pharmacies and insurance plans.

        USCDI v6 and Standards Bulletin 25-2

        USCDI v6 and Standards Bulletin 25-2

        The United States Core Data for Interoperability Version 6 (USCDI v6) is now available! USCDI v6 includes an updated list of data classes and elements that seek to advance health data in a way that will benefit users of health IT. We also released the latest Standards Bulletin, which describes ASTP’s continued expansion of USCDI.

  • About
      • Overview
        • About ASTP

          Mission, role, and responsibilities of ASTP.

        • Leadership

          Profiles of ASTP’s senior leadership team.

        • History

          Timeline of ASTP’s evolution and key milestones.

        • Budget & Performance

          Financial reports and performance accountability.

        • Investments

          Strategic investments in programs, policies, and technology.

        • Reports to Congress

          Annual health data and technology progress updates to Congress.

      • Careers
        • Careers at ASTP

          View opportunities with ASTP.

        • Working at ASTP

          Overview of workplace culture and employee experience.

      • Contact
        • Contact Us

          Reach ASTP with general inquiries.

        • Health IT Feedback Form

          Users can submit feedback regarding health data and technology usability, interoperability, and compliance issues.

        • Report Issue with Certified Health IT

          Complaint process to resolve any issues of potential noncompliance with certification requirements.

        • Information Blocking Claim

          Form to report alleged information blocking practices.

        • Speaker Request

          Form to request ASTP experts for speaking engagements.

      • Funding Opportunities
        • Funding Announcements

          ASTP’s contractors and grantees play a valuable role in helping promote better health care for Americans by fostering interoperable health data and technology.

        • Grants Management & Process

          Learn about opportunities for funding through grants and cooperative agreements.

Popular searches: certifications information blocking interoperability

Health IT Research & Analysis

    • Data Types
    • Categories
    • Sort By
Data Briefs iconData Briefs

Trends in Individuals’ Access, Viewing and Use of Online Medical Records and Other Technology for Health Needs: 2017-2018

No. 48 | May 2019
  • Trends in Individuals’ Access, Viewing and Use of Online Medical Records and Other Technology for Health Needs: 2017-2018 [PDF – 1.03 MB]
Link to Page Icon Link to Page
  • Overview

The access, exchange, and use of electronic health information is essential for individuals to better manage their health care needs and share information with their providers and caregivers. Many hospitals and physicians possess capabilities that enable patients to view and download their health information. However, additional steps are needed to make health information more accessible and useful to individuals (1, 2). A majority of individuals have smartphones and use applications (apps) to help them manage various tasks. The 21st Century Cures Act emphasizes the importance of making patient health information more easily accessible and the need for greater education regarding patients’ rights to access their health information (3). This data brief uses the Health Information Trends Survey (HINTS), a nationally representative survey, to assess individuals’ access, viewing and use of their online medical records, and the use of smartphone health apps and other electronic devices in 2017 and 2018.

Highlights

  • The percentage of individuals who were offered access to their online medical record did not change between 2017 (52%) and 2018 (51%).
  • In 2018, about 3 in 10 individuals were offered access to their online medical record and viewed their record at least once within the past year.
  • Individuals’ rates of being offered access and viewing their online medical records at least once in the past year varied by their health care use, socio-demographic characteristics, Internet access and use, and health.
  • Among individuals who viewed their online medical record at least once in the past year, the percentage that downloaded their health information increased by about one-third between 2017 and 2018.
  • In 2018, half of smartphone or tablet owners had health or wellness apps which were commonly used to track progress towards a health-related goal (75%).

The percentage of individuals offered access to their online medical record did not change between 2017 and 2018.

Figure 1: Percent of individuals ever offered access to their online medical record by a health care provider or insurer by whether they viewed their online medical record, 2014-2018

dashboard-databrief-21
Source: HINTS 4 Cycle 4, 2014; HINTS 5, Cycle 1, 2017; HINTS 5, Cycle 2, 2018.
Notes: *Significantly different from previous year (p<0.05). Denominator represents all individuals. Percentage reflects weighted national estimate.
  • In 2018, three in 10 individuals were offered access to their online medical record and viewed their record at least once within the past year

Among individuals who had been offered access to an online medical record, nearly six in 10 viewed their record at least once in 2018.

Figure 2: Frequency of viewing an online medical record within the past year among those who had been offered an online medical record by a health care provider or insurer, 2017-2018.

dashboard-databrief-22
Source: HINTS 5, Cycle 1, 2017; HINTS 5, Cycle 2, 2018.
Note: Numbers do not add up to 58% due to rounding. Denominator represents individuals who were offered access to their online medical record (52% of individuals nationwide in 2017; 51% of individuals nationwide in 2018).
  • Between 2017 and 2018, there were no differences in frequency of viewing online medical records.
  • In 2018, among individuals who were offered access to their online medical record, about three in 10 individuals viewed their data one to two times per year.
  • In 2018, among individuals offered access to their online medical record, only about one in 10 viewed their data six or more times within the past year.

Individuals’ viewing of online medical records varied by their health care usage, rural/urban location, socio-demographic characteristics, Internet access and use, and overall health.

Table 1: Variation in individuals being offered and accessing their online medical records by selected characteristics, 2017-2018 (combined sample)

Characteristic% Individuals who were offered access to online medical records by characteristic (2017-2018)Among individuals offered an online medical record, % who viewed their record by characteristic (2017-2018)
GenderMale (reference)45%54%
Female57%*^58%
Annual Household Income$0 to $34,99936%*^41%*^
$35,000 to $74,99949%*^53%*^
$75,000 or more (reference)65%66%
EducationCollege Degree or more63%*^68%*^
Less than College (reference)46%48%
Internet access and useYes57%*^59%*^
No (reference)26%24%
Geography Urban52%*57%*^
Rural (reference)45%45%
Doctor Visit in Past YearYes57%*^58%*^
No (reference)27%38%
Health Insurance CoverageYes54%*^57%*
No (reference)25%34%
Have a Chronic ConditionYes55%*^57%^
No (reference)46%54%
Source: HINTS 5, Cycle 1, 2017; HINTS 5, Cycle 2, 2018.
Notes: Unadjusted weighted national estimate shown. *Unadjusted estimate significantly different from reference category (p<0.05). ^Adjusted estimate (not shown) significantly different from reference category (p<0.05). The adjusted estimates controlled for survey year (2017/2018), gender, age, race/ethnicity, income, education, geography, having seen a doctor in the past year, internet access, chronic condition, and health insurance. Chronic condition was defined as having at least one of the following conditions: diabetes, hypertension, chronic heart disease, chronic lung disease, arthritis, or a mental health condition.
  • Access to online medical records varied by individuals’ health care use, socio-demographic characteristics, Internet access and use, and by whether they had a chronic health condition.
  • Individuals with an annual household income of $75,000 were more likely to be offered access as well as view their online medical record compared to those with less income.
  • Individuals who went to the doctor at least once within the past year were twice as likely to be offered access to their online medical record, and were over 50 percent more likely to view their online medical record at least once compared to those who did not visit their doctor within the past year.
  • Individuals with at least a college degree had higher rates of being offered access and subsequently viewing their online medical records compared to those with less than a college degree.
  • Individuals with chronic health conditions were more likely to be offered access and view their online medical records compared to individuals without chronic health conditions.

Most individuals cited their preference to speak to a provider directly and perceived lack of need as reasons for not viewing their online medical records in 2017 and 2018.

Table 2: Reasons for not accessing online medical record as reported by individuals who did not view their online medical record within the past year, 2017-2018.

Reason for Not Using Online Record20172018
Prefer to speak to health care provider directly76%73%
Did not have a need to use your online medical record59%65%
Concerned about the privacy/security of online medical record25%14%*
No longer have an online medical record19%13%
Do not have a way to access the website20%10%*
Source: HINTS 5, Cycle 1, 2017; HINTS 5, Cycle 2, 2018.
Note: *Significantly different from previous year (p<0.05). Denominator represents individuals who were offered an online medical record but did not view their record within the past year.
  • About three-quarters of individuals cited their preference to speak with their health care provider directly as a reason for not using their online medical record within the past year.
  • The percent of individuals who did not view their online medical record within the past year due to privacy and security concerns decreased by 11 percentage points between 2017 and 2018.
  • Individuals who went to the doctor at least once within the past year were twice as likely to be offered access to their online medical record, and were over 50 percent more likely to view their online medical record at least once compared to those who did not visit their doctor within the past year.
  • Fewer individuals reported not having a way to access their online medical record’s website as a reason for not viewing their record in 2018 compared to 2017.

Nearly eight in 10 individuals who viewed their online medical record reported that it included summaries of their office visits in 2018.

Table 3: Types of information reported in individuals’ medical record amongst those who were offered and viewed their record within the past year, 2017-2018.

Type of Information20172018
Clinical notes51%51%
Immunization or vaccination history55%58%
Allergy list62%61%
List of health/medical problems70%72%
Summaries of your office visit76%78%
Current list of medications79%–
Laboratory test results92%–
Source: HINTS 5, Cycle 1, 2017; HINTS 5, Cycle 2, 2018.
Note: Denominator represents individuals who were offered access to the online medical record and viewed their online medical records at least once within the last year. Data for Current List of Medications and Laboratory Test Results were not collected in 2018.
  • There were no changes in the availability of specific types of information in individuals’ online medical records between 2017 and 2018.
  • In 2018, about six in 10 individuals who viewed their online medical record reported having access to their vaccination history and allergy list.
  • A majority of individuals who had viewed their online medical record indicated that it included a list of their health/medical problems and summaries of their office visits.
  • Among individuals who had viewed their online medical record within the past year (representing 30% nationally), about half indicated clinical notes were included in their online medical record.

In 2018, the percent of individuals who viewed their online medical record and downloaded their record data increased by over 30 percent.

Table 4: Among those viewed their record at least once within the past year, the percentage that used view, download, or transmit functionalities 2017-2018.

View, Download or Transmit20172018
View test results84%–
Download online medical record data17%26%*
Transmitted data to at least one outside party listed below14%17%
Transmit to another healthcare provider10%14%
Transmit to caregiver4%4%
Transmit to service or app3%3%
Source: HINTS 5, Cycle 1, 2017; HINTS 5, Cycle 2, 2018.
Note: *Significantly different from previous year (p<0.05). Denominator represents individuals who viewed their online medical records at least once within the last year (30% of respondents). Data for View Test Results was not collected in 2018.
  • One quarter of individuals who viewed their online medical record also downloaded their data in 2018.
  • In 2018, nearly one in five individuals who viewed their online medical record also transmitted their data to an outside party (another healthcare provider, caregiver, or app/service).
  • In 2017 and 2018, only three percent of individuals who viewed their record within the past year transmitted their record data to a service or app.

Half of individuals that viewed their online medical record used it to communicate with their health care providers via secure messaging in 2018.

Table 5: Reported online medical record functionalities used by individuals amongst those who were offered and viewed their record, 2017-2018.

Uses of Online Medical Record20172018
Convenience Functions
Request refill of medications38%39%
Fill out forms or paperwork related to your health care38%44%*
Updating Medical Record
Request correction of inaccurate information8%7%
Add health information19%24%
Communicating with Health Care Provider
Securely message health care provider and staff (e.g., e-mail)48%53%
Decision Making
Help you make a decision about how to treat an illness or condition19%24%
Perceptions regarding Usefulness of Online Medical Record
Consider online medical record useful for monitoring health84%83%
Source: HINTS 5, Cycle 1, 2017; HINTS 5, Cycle 2, 2018.
Note: Denominator represents individuals who were offered access to the online medical record and viewed their online medical records at least once within the last year.
  • Among those who viewed their online medical record, about four in 10 used it to request medical refills and fill out forms related to their health care in 2018.
  • The percent of individuals who reported using their online medical record to fill out forms related to their health care increased by six percentage points between 2017 and 2018.
  • Among individuals who viewed their online medical record, about 10 percent requested corrections to their online medical record in 2018.
  • More than eight in 10 individuals who viewed their record reported that their online medical record was useful for monitoring their health in 2018.

In 2018, half of smartphone or tablet owners used a health or wellness app

Table 6: Percent of individuals who reported having a smartphone, tablet, electronic monitoring device, or health and wellness app, 2017-2018.

Type of Device20172018
Electronic Monitoring Device (e.g., Fitbit, blood glucose meter, blood pressure device)34%35%
Tablet62%58%
Smartphone79%80%
Tablet or Smartphone84%84%
Health and Wellness App (among those with a tablet or smartphone)44%49%
Source: HINTS 5, Cycle 1, 2017; HINTS 5, Cycle 2, 2018.
Note: Examples of an electronic monitoring device include Fitbit, blood glucose meter, and/or blood pressure monitor
  • The proportion of individuals who reported owning a tablet, smartphone, or other electronic monitoring device did not change between 2017 and 2018.
  • Over eight in 10 individuals reported owning a tablet or smartphone in 2018.
  • One-third of individuals owned an electronic monitoring device such as a Fitbit, blood glucose meter, or blood pressure monitor in 2018.

Three-quarters of individuals with a health and wellness app used it to track progress on a healthrelated goal in 2018.

Table 7: : Percent of individuals who reported using their health and wellness app or other electronic monitoring device to help discuss, track, and/or make decisions regarding their health, 2017-2018.

Use of Electronic Device20172018
Individuals with a health & wellness app1
Track progress on a health-related goal69%75%*
Make a decision about how to treat an illness or condition45%48%
Discuss your health with your health care provider43%45%
Individuals with a health & wellness app or other electronic monitoring device2
Shared information from a smartphone, tablet, or other electronic monitoring device with a health professional26%28%
Source: HINTS 5, Cycle 1, 2017; HINTS 5, Cycle 2, 2018.
Note: *Significantly different from previous year (p<0.05). Examples of an electronic monitoring device include Fitbit, blood glucose meter, and/or blood pressure monitor. 1Denominator represents the sample of individuals that report having a health and wellness app; 2Denominator represents the sample of individuals that report having a health and wellness app or electronic monitoring device.
  • The percentage of individuals who had a health and wellness app and used it to track progress on a healthrelated goal increased by six percentage points between 2017 and 2018.
  • In 2018, about half of individuals with a health and wellness app used it to make a decision about how to treat an illness or condition; a similar number used it to facilitate discussions with their health care provider.
  • More than a quarter of health and wellness app or other electronic monitoring device users shared information from their device with a health professional in 2018.

In 2018, one in five individuals owned a tablet or smartphone and were offered access to their online medical record but had not viewed their record within the past year.

Figure 3: Percent of individuals who were offered access and subsequently viewed their online medical record by whether they owned a smartphone/tablet, 2018.

dashboard-databrief-23
Source: HINTS 5, Cycle 2, 2018.
Notes: Denominator represents all individuals. Percentage reflects weighted national estimate. Percentages do not add up to 84% due to rounding.
  • Almost three in 10 individuals owned a smartphone or tablet and viewed their online medical record at least once within the past year.
  • Over one-third of individuals owned a smartphone or tablet and were not offered access to an online medical record.

Summary

Individuals’ rates of access and frequency of viewing their online medical records did not change between 2017 and 2018.  In 2018, about half of individuals were offered online access to their medical record by a health care provider or insurer.  Among these individuals, 58 percent viewed their online medical record at least once within the past year. Nationally, this  represents about three in 10 individuals. With the exception of using online medical records to download health  information and fill out paperwork, individuals’ use of other functionalities remained similar to 2017. The availability of  specific types of information in individuals’ online medical records also did not change.

Individuals who did not view their online medical record most commonly cited their preference to communicate directly  with health care providers (rather than using the online medical record) and a perceived lack of need. The percent of  individuals citing privacy and security concerns as reasons for not viewing their online medical record dropped  considerably in 2018. This might reflect an increase in the percentage of individuals nationally who express confidence  that safeguards are in place to protect medical records from unauthorized viewing (4).

Individuals’ rates of being offered and viewing their online medical record varied by factors related to health care access  and use, socio-demographic characteristics, Internet use, and health. For example, individuals who had a doctor visit  within the past year were twice as likely to be offered access to their online medical record compared to those who did  not see their doctor. After adjusting for a variety of factors, including health care access and use, individuals with higher  income and greater education were more likely to be offered access and subsequently view their online medical record.  This suggests greater efforts are needed to offer access and encourage usage of online medical records across all  individuals. Both ONC’s Patient Engagement Playbook and Guide to Getting and Using your Health Record offer tips to  providers and patients, respectively, that can make this process easier.

About eight in 10 individuals in 2018 had a tablet or smartphone. Among these individuals, about half had a health or  wellness app. Encouragingly, three-quarters of health or wellness app users tracked progress on health-related goals and  about half used their apps to make treatment-related decisions. Moreover, almost three in 10 individuals who owned a  health and wellness app or an electronic monitoring device shared information from these devices with health care  providers. However, few individuals reported transmitting their online medical record data to a health app. This may be  related to providers’ limited capabilities in offering this function (1, 2).

Making it easier for individuals to use apps to access, view, and subsequently share their online medical record data may  enable individuals to better manage their health and address gaps in interoperability. ONC’s proposed rule seeks to make  patient health information from electronic health records accessible through application programming interfaces (APIs)  (3). APIs are technology that allow a software developer to create programs and mobile apps that interact with another  software without needing to know the “internal” workings of that software. The rule, as proposed, promotes the creation  of apps that would enable individuals to more easily access and use their personal health information (5). One in five  individuals had a smartphone or tablet and were offered access to an online medical record but did not view their record  within the past year. Usage of online records by smartphone and tablet users, could increase if apps that provided access  to view medical record data were widely available; such apps are being piloted by some health systems (6, 7). ONC’s  recent proposed rule would make it easier for health IT developers to make such products widely available, allowing  individuals to more easily access, exchange, and use their health information (5).

Definitions

Definitions for variables derived by ONC during this analysis are described below:

Offered access to an online medical record: Individuals were considered to be offered access to an online medical record  if they responded “yes” to either health care provider or insurer for the question, “Have you ever been offered online  access to your medical records by: a) health care provider? b) health insurer?”

Ease of Understanding the Health Information in Your Online Medical Record: Health information was considered “Easy  to Understand” if an individual responded “Very easy” or “Somewhat easy” to the question, “How easy was it to  understand the health information in your online medical record?” Health information was considered “Difficult to  Understand” if an individual responded “Very difficult” or “Somewhat difficult” to the same question.

Data Source and Methods

Data are from the National Cancer Institute’s (NCI) Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS). Since 2003, NCI  has sponsored HINTS to assess the impacts of health communication, specifically measuring: how people access and use  health information, how people use information technology to manage their health and health information, and the  degree to which people are engaged in health behaviors.

ONC staff, working with the National Partnership of Women and Families and NCI, developed the survey content related  to health IT use for HINTS 5. HINTS 5, Cycle 2 (2018) data were collected from January through May 2018. The sample  design for HINTS 5, Cycle 2 (2018) consisted of a single-mode mail survey, using the Next Birthday Method for respondent  selection.

The sample design for the HINTS 5, Cycle 2 (2018) survey consisted of two-stages. In the first stage, a stratified sample of  addresses was selected from a file of residential addresses. In the second-stage, one adult was selected within each  sampled household. The sampling frame consisted of a database of addresses used by Marketing Systems Group (MSG)  to provide random samples addresses. Complete data were collected from 3,527 respondents. The response rate was in  33%, and results were weighted to account for non-response and generate national estimates.

The analyses conducted in this data brief primarily focused on questions from sections B and D. The questions asked in  the HINTS 5, Cycle 2 (2018) survey can be found at  https://hints.cancer.gov/docs/Instruments/HINTS5_Cycle2_Annotated_Instrument_English.pdf

References

  1. Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology. ‘U.S. Hospital Adoption of Patient Engagement Functionalities,’ Health IT Quick-Stat #24. dashboard. healthit.gov/quickstats/pages/FIG-Hospital Adoption-of-Patient-Engagement-Functionalities.php. September 2016.
  2. Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology. ‘Office-based Physician Electronic Patient Engagement Capabilities,’ Health IT Quick-Stat #54. dashboard.healthit.gov/quickstats/pages/physicians-view download-transmit-secure-messaging-patient-engagement.php. December 2016.
  3. 21st Century Cures Act, section 4006. https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-114publ255/pdf/PLAW 114publ255.pdf
  4. Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology. ‘Individuals’ Perceptions of the Privacy and Security of Medical Records and Health Information Exchange,’ Health IT Quick-Stat #58. dashboard.healthit.gov/quickstats/pages/consumers-privacy-security-medical-record-information-exchange.php. May 2018.
  5. Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology. Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to Improve the Interoperability of Health Information. https://www.healthit.gov/topic/laws-regulation-and policy/notice-proposed-rulemaking-improve-interoperability-health
  6. KLAS. Apple Health Records 2018: Early Participants Weigh In. 2018. https://klasresearch.com/report/apple health-records-2018/1364
  7. Christian Dameff; Brian Clay; & Christopher A. Longhurst. Personal Health Records More Promising in the Smartphone Era? JAMA. January 29, 2019. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2721088

Acknowledgements

The authors are with the Office of Technology, within the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information  Technology. The data brief was drafted under the direction of Mera Choi, Director of Technical Strategy and Analysis  Division, and Talisha Searcy, Director of the Data Analysis Branch.

Suggested Citation

Patel V & Johnson C. (May 2019). Trends in Individuals’ Access and Use of Online Medical Records and Technology for Health Needs: 2017-2018. ONC Data Brief, no.48 Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology: Washington DC.

Form Approved OMB# 0990-0379 Exp. Date 9/30/2025
Submit Beta Feedback

Submit Beta Feedback

Step 1 of 3

33%
Name(Required)
Please provide your email address for follow-up.
What kind of issue are you experiencing?(Required)
Select the type of issue you encountered. Select all that apply.
Where did you experience this issue?(Required)
Select the type of issue you encountered. Select all that apply.
Example: Google Chrome on PC or Safari on iPhone.

Page Information

What page did you find this issue? e.g. Interoperability, ASTP Blog
e.g. https://beta.healthit.gov/interoperability
Please provide a detailed description of the issue you experienced.
Drop files here or
Max. file size: 3 MB, Max. files: 3.
    If you have any screenshots or files related to the issue, please upload them here.

    Subscribe for Email Updates

    EXPLORE

    • Certification of Health IT
    • Information Blocking
    • Interoperability
    • Health Information Technology Advisory Committee (HITAC)
    • Patient Access to Health Records
    • TEFCA
    • Policy
    • Resources

    DATA

    • HealthData.gov
    • Health IT Research & Analysis

    NEWS & EVENTS

    • Media Center
    • ASTP Blog
    • News
    • Events

    ABOUT

    • About ASTP/ONC
    • Careers
    • Contact
    • Funding Opportunities
    ASTP Logo HHS
    Linkedin
    X
    YouTube
    • Privacy Policy
    • Website Disclaimers
    • Viewers & Players
    • GobiernoUSA.gov
    • HHS Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
    • Archived Content

    External Link Notice

    Welcome to our new beta site!

    Thank you for visiting the new beta version of the HealthIT.gov website! We’re continuing to make improvements behind the scenes. You may see some features and performance change during this time. We welcome your feedback using the "Submit Feedback" button at the bottom of the page to help us improve your experience!